On 2020-04-03 10:25 +0200, 🦁 Martin Wagner wrote: > Hello, > > creating a new LFS on an ARM (aarch64) System (Rockpro64 with DietPi- > distribution) stops on compiling GCC in chapter 5.10. (GCC-9.2.0 - Pass 2) > with an Error 1: > > build/genautomata.o build/rtl.o build/read-rtl.o build/ggc-none.o build/vec.o > build/min-insn-modes.o build/gensupport.o build/print-rtl.o > build/hash-table.o > build/sort.o build/read-md.o build/errors.o ../build-aarch64-unknown-linux- > gnu/libiberty/libiberty.a -lm > build/genautomata ../../gcc/common.md ../../gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md \ > insn-conditions.md > tmp-automata.c > build/genautomata: /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.29' not > found (required by build/genautomata) > Makefile:2328: recipe for target 's-automata' failed > make[2]: *** [s-automata] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory '/mnt/USB_LFS/sources/gcc-9.2.0/build_2/gcc' > Makefile:4330: recipe for target 'all-gcc' failed > make[1]: *** [all-gcc] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory '/mnt/USB_LFS/sources/gcc-9.2.0/build_2' > Makefile:960: recipe for target 'all' failed > make: *** [all] Error 2 > lfs@DietPi:/mnt/USB_LFS/sources/gcc-9.2.0/build_2$ > > > This error is independent if I use GlibC 2.31 or 2.29 for compiling. > > The host system itself has libc-2.24/libm-2.24 > > build/genautomata: /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.29' not > found (required by build/genautomata) > Makefile:2328: recipe for target 's-automata' failed > > I'm not shure, why compiling with access to the hostsystem "/lib/aarch64- > linux-gnu/libm.so.6"? > > > Any ideas fixing this ? > > Thank You.
LFS does not support ARM. You need to adjust the instructions, at least in GCC (pass1, pass2, and final). I don't have the hardware so I can't tell how to adjust. -- Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
