Correction: "running these tests" (for util-linux). On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 2:47 PM Bud Rozwood <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I'm trying to run the test suite as a non-root user for Util-linux for the > LFS version 9.1 but I keep getting 1 test failure for "column: invalid > multibyte" test. > > I'm on an x86_64 bit machine, using pacman package manager. Here are the > installed packages > > # pacman -Q > warning: no 'XferCommand' configured > Python 3.8.1-1 > acl 2.2.53-1 > attr 2.4.48-1 > autoconf 2.69-1 > automake 1.16.1-1 > bash 5.0-1 > bc 2.5.3-1 > binutils 2.34-1 > bison 3.5.2-1 > bzip2 1.0.8-1 > check 0.14.0-1 > coreutils 8.31-1 > cracklib 2.9.7-4 > diffutils 3.7-1 > expat 2.2.9-1 > expect 5.45.4-1 > file 5.38-1 > findutils 4.7.0-1 > flex 2.6.4-1 > gawk 5.0.1-1 > gcc 9.2.0-1 > gdbm 1.18.1-1 > gettext 0.20.1-1 > glibc 2.31-3 > gmp 6.2.0-1 > gperf 3.1-1 > grep 3.4-1 > groff 1.22.4-1 > grub 2.04-1 > gzip 1.10-1 > iana-etc 2.30-1 > inetutils 1.9.4-1 > intltool 0.51.0-1 > iproute2 5.5.0-1 > kbd 2.2.0-1 > kmod 26-1 > libcap 2.31-1 > libelf 0.178-3 > libffi 3.3-1 > libpipeline 1.5.2-1 > libtool 2.4.6-1 > linux-headers 5.5.3-1 > m4 1.4.18-1 > make 4.3-1 > man-db 2.9.0-1 > man-pages 5.05-1 > meson 0.53.1-1 > mpc 1.1.0-1 > mpfr 4.0.2-1 > ncurses 6.2-1 > ninja 1.10.0-1 > openssl 1.1.1f-1 > pacman 5.2.1-4 > patch 2.7.6-1 > perl 5.30.1-1 > pkg-config 0.29.2-1 > procps-ng 3.3.15-1 > psmisc 23.2-1 > readline 8.0-1 > sed 4.8-1 > shadow 4.8.1-1 > tar 1.32-1 > tcl 8.6.10-1 > texinfo 6.7-1 > tzdata 2019c-1 > vim 8.2.0190-1 > xml-parser 2.46-1 > xz 5.2.4-1 > zlib 1.2.11-1 > zstd 1.4.4-1 > > I did find that Assaf Gordan mentioned something about it on spinics.net > mailing list with the subject Re: [ANNOUNCE] util-linux v2.30-rc2 > <https://www.spinics.net/lists/util-linux-ng/msg14016.html>, but that was > for an older version of util-linux. So I thought it might of been my > locales but I don't think so: > > $ locale > LANG= > LC_CTYPE="POSIX" > LC_NUMERIC="POSIX" > LC_TIME="POSIX" > LC_COLLATE="POSIX" > LC_MONETARY="POSIX" > LC_MESSAGES="POSIX" > LC_PAPER="POSIX" > LC_NAME="POSIX" > LC_ADDRESS="POSIX" > LC_TELEPHONE="POSIX" > LC_MEASUREMENT="POSIX" > LC_IDENTIFICATION="POSIX" > LC_ALL= > > I've compared it with the LFS test-logs > <http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/9.1/i7-5820K/test-logs/140-util-linux-2.35.1> > on an i7 processor (similar to mine) but they got them to all pass. Should > I worry about this? > > From what I've read in the book, running the tests are optional so I feel > like I should move on. Any insight will be greatly appreciated. >
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
