On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:45:58 +0900 Yotta Point <yottapo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:40 AM Douglas R. Reno < > ren...@linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > > > > > On 11/25/20 7:28 PM, Yotta Point wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I managed to build the LFS for 32Bit and now I am trying to make it > > a 64Bit version. > > I am stuck at step 5.5 Glibc build in the LSB compliance. > > > > case $(uname -m) in > > i?86) ln -sfv ld-linux.so.2 $LFS/lib/ld-lsb.so.3 > > ;; > > x86_64) ln -sfv ../lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 $LFS/lib64 > > ln -sfv ../lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 > > $LFS/lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3 ;; > > esac > > > > the second ln is failing saying "No such file or directory" which > > seems normal to me because the first line create a symlink at > > $LFS/lib64 that links to a library, and the second line is trying > > to access the symlink "$LFS/lib64" as if it was a directory. I am > > missing something here ? > > > > Thanks for your help ! > > > > Hi, > > > > > > For 32-bit systems, only the line that starts with i?86 is > > necessary. For 64-bit systems, you'd follow x86_64. > > > > Note that most users copy and paste that block of commands into > > their terminal so the system follows what part is needed. > > > > - Doug > > -- > > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > > > Do not top post on this list. > > > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read > > text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > > A: Top-posting. > > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > > > Hey, thanks for your quick reply. > Maybe I did not correctly explain my issue. In the x86_64) case, > there are 2 commands. "ln -sfv ../lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 > $LFS/lib64" and " ln -sfv ../lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 > $LFS/lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3". The second ln is giving me back "No > such file or directory" and I think it's because the first "ln" is > making "$LFS/lib64" a symlink to a library, and the second ln is > trying to access "$LFS/lib64" as if it was a directory. > > Sorry if my first post was not explicit enough. Did a /lib64 directory in section 4.2? -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
