On 3/11/21 10:18 PM, Brian Hagen wrote:
Hello, all
I have been through the LFS 10.1 build twice with the same results.
It goes all the way through without apparent flaw until the kernel build
at 10.3.1. Then it bombs out with the following:
-------------------------------------
scripts/extract-cert.c:21:25: fatal error: openssl/bio.h: No such file
or directory
#include <openssl/bio.h>
^
compilation terminated.
make[1]: *** [scripts/extract-cert] Error 1
make: *** [scripts] Error 2
---------------------------------
The first attempt also registered missing "ncurses" files. When I
went back to section 8.28.1 to compile them, it appeared to go well.
Still, the files did not show up when and where needed at 10.3.1.
Attempts to rebuild OpenSSL did not work; apparently the environment was
not correct.
I was fastidious about making notes that each section had been done,
marking them off on a written sheet to be certain that no sections had
been omitted. Also, near the end, when there is supposed to be a user
'tester' taken out of the system, apparently no user "tester' was
anywhere to be found.
I don't want to just go back and start all over because that would
only recreate the same results at section 10.3.1.
One element I find odd is that it appears that the make menuconfig
and make defconfig sections are rather puzzling as to which one needs to
be run first.
For #include <openssl/bio.h>, you should have /usr/include/openssl/.
That directory should have bio.h and about 100 other .h files. Are you
sure yo installed openssl?
The user tester should be created in section 7.6. Creating Essential
Files and Symlinks. If you did not run the tests, then it is not needed
but we do recommend running th etests for at least gcc where it is used.
It is also used for running tests for six other packages.
Run defconfig first. That sets up a default configuration for your
system. Then use menuconfig to edit the configuration.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
