On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 11:02:56AM +0300, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote: > > Originally, I used memmove/memchr for speed--they're well-optimized. In > > retrospect, that's also iterating over the input buffer twice (though in > > a cache-friendly way.) > > > > Here's one that anyone can understand: > > This one is nicer indeed. And smaller. It has a bug but it does not matter.
Er, what is it? Passed my tests (leading, trailing, consecutive \r\n with or without null terminator.) -- Glenn Maynard
