Alexander, I think it's the "newer than" member that needs to be adjusted to solve my issue. However, I think the same might also be true with "older than" as well (which you changed) but I do not use that currently. Basically, it's how to handle timestamps that match the arg to the second. Currently, they get included but I don't think they should (matching what the doc states)...but, that is, of course, open to debate.
What I did to get around this issue for the time being was add the touch command touch -r $Lastfile -F 1 lastfile to my lftp driver script which takes the last file transferred down from the ftp site and creates the "lastfile" sentinel 1 (one) second in the future so that the last file does not get included again in the next pull. Thanks for looking at this, Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexander V. Lukyanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Michael Leib" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[email protected]>; "John Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Peter Sites" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2007 9:48 PM Subject: Re: Possible Bug in lftp > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 04:53:51PM -0700, Michael Leib wrote: >> But, it appears it's doing "equal to and newer than a specified time". > > Does the attached patch help? > > -- > Alexander. | software is knowlege > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
