Hello, > Good question... I guess we should measure performance impact. We could > rewrite the hypercall site to do an int 15 after the first time (rewriting > is what kvm does, so it's allowed). Bonus is that old code would "just > work".
Could you please elaborate on this? I´d like to help with this issue. By the way, I just started to write some code, so we can use kvm_hypercall4(). I think I will need this one for completing PAE implementation. They (kvm) use %esi for passing the fourth argument, which is next to %edx in lguest_regs, so I guess I just need to add a new member (arg4) to struct hcall_args. My question is, should I build on top of my previous patchs, or should I wait until we arrive to a definitive soultion ? thank you Matías _______________________________________________ Lguest mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/lguest
