Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Or again just generate them on demand when the interrupt is set up.
> If you really have 240 interrupts sources you can afford the 5k likely,
> but for most there will be only a minimum number of stubs.
>
> Although frankly I suspect there are far easier ways to save 5k of memory.
>
Generating them dynamically is probably pretty ugly too, though.
Shrinking the whole table down to 2K by just regularizing the structure
is trivial, though, and should almost certainly be a win. The more
esoteric ideas are probably worse.
-hpa
_______________________________________________
Lguest mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/lguest
