On 03/23/2011 08:20 AM, Alexander Strange wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 03/23/2011 03:31 AM, John Stebbins wrote:
>>> fwiw, I've verified that both patches solve the original problem I had.
>>
>> I'd pick your since I expect to have 0 duration frames sooner or later.
> 
> Expect to have them where?

The current specification states that Duration should be >0 (as already
discussed in the thread), so both patch are safe and correct now.
Setting the default in a more explicit way feels more futureproof.

Adding a comment on the Aurel patch would make me happy as well.

lu

-- 

Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero

_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to