On 03/23/2011 08:20 AM, Alexander Strange wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 03/23/2011 03:31 AM, John Stebbins wrote: >>> fwiw, I've verified that both patches solve the original problem I had. >> >> I'd pick your since I expect to have 0 duration frames sooner or later. > > Expect to have them where?
The current specification states that Duration should be >0 (as already discussed in the thread), so both patch are safe and correct now. Setting the default in a more explicit way feels more futureproof. Adding a comment on the Aurel patch would make me happy as well. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
