Hi, On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Vitor Sessak <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/26/2011 08:15 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> $subj. This is useful since with -mt enabled, order of packets >> changes, which makes the original fate test fail. > > I'm not against this patch, but how hard would it be to reorder packets so > that if two packets have the same timestamp, to output the audio one first?
Not very difficult, I think. But is that correct? (There's other timestamping-related issues with -mt that are other bugs. The reason I changed the fate test rather than fix the code for this particular one is because I believe the behaviour is acceptable.) Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
