On date Tuesday 2011-04-05 00:32:07 +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 11:21:51PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote: [...] > > Stupid question, what's wrong with av_protocol_next()? > > > > And why to drop the listing of the protocol features in > > show_protocols()? > > We're making the whole unbuffered API, including URLProtocol, private, > so an external app won't have any access to members of URLProtocol.
What's the point of it? Also this is preventing an application to write a custom access protocol (not to mention this is breaking backward compatibility and reducing functionality as in this patch). _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
