Hi, On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Anton Khirnov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 01:49:47PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> From: Stefano Sabatini <[email protected]> >> >> The fixes were pointed out by Diego. >> >> Signed-off-by: Janne Grunau <[email protected]> >> (cherry picked from commit 0cad24ce9b02037c9cdad84cae905f96b04d7d4c) >> --- >> doc/muxers.texi | 9 +++++---- >> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/doc/muxers.texi b/doc/muxers.texi >> index a65b914..ead9869 100644 >> --- a/doc/muxers.texi >> +++ b/doc/muxers.texi >> @@ -94,12 +94,13 @@ See also the @code{crc} muxer (@pxref{crc}). >> >> Image file muxer. >> >> -This muxer writes video frames to multiple image files specified by a >> -pattern. >> +The image file muxer writes video frames to image files. >> >> -The pattern may contain the string "%d" or "%0@var{N}d", which >> +The output filenames are specified by a pattern, which can be used to >> +produce sequentially numbered series of files. >> +The pattern may contain the string "%d" or "%0@var{N}d", this string >> specifies the position of the characters representing a numbering in >> -the filenames. If the form "%d0@var{N}d" is used, the string >> +the filenames. If the form "%0@var{N}d" is used, the string >> representing the number in each filename is 0-padded to @var{N} >> digits. The literal character '%' can be specified in the pattern with >> the string "%%". > > This one is a reverse of 01.
Actually, yes. Shall we just remove both from the queue then? Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
