On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 03:19:43PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Kostya <[email protected]> wrote: > >> in general looks ok but won't it cause noticeable performance drop? > >> If yes than maybe it's better to use single flag and have two codepaths > >> with > >> constants. > > > > Maybe. I figured that it might, and wrote the patch halfway adding the > > two codepaths depending on the res_fasttx flag, but it makes it look > > pretty clumsy, so I decided to do it this way. Should be OK. If we > > ever want to do everything and the world to optimize wmv3/vc1, we can > > expand this into constant versions under if/else. > > before: user 0m47.125s > after: user 0m47.088s > > So a negligible speed difference. The difference you're seeing is most > likely noise, because it should get slower, not faster...
ok then (don't forget to remove stray whitespace before applying though) _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
