Hi, On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > --- > doc/faq.texi | 6 ------ > tests/copycooker.sh | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/doc/faq.texi b/doc/faq.texi > index 3daf44f..a29af1e 100644 > --- a/doc/faq.texi > +++ b/doc/faq.texi > @@ -415,12 +415,6 @@ be rewritten in a formal object language. Further, many > of the developers > favor straight C; it works for them. For more arguments on this matter, > read "Programming Religion" at (@url{http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s15}). > > -@section Why are the ffmpeg programs devoid of debugging symbols? > - > -The build process creates ffmpeg_g, ffplay_g, etc. which contain full debug > -information. Those binaries are stripped to create ffmpeg, ffplay, etc. If > -you need the debug information, use the *_g versions. > - > @section I do not like the LGPL, can I contribute code under the GPL instead? > > Yes, as long as the code is optional and can easily and cleanly be placed > diff --git a/tests/copycooker.sh b/tests/copycooker.sh > index 4b5811d..3118e3f 100755 > --- a/tests/copycooker.sh > +++ b/tests/copycooker.sh > @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ rm -f $logfile > for i in $list ; do > echo ---------------- >> $logfile > echo $i >> $logfile > - ./ffmpeg_g -flags +bitexact -i $i -acodec copy -vcodec copy -y first.nut > - ./ffmpeg_g -flags +bitexact -i first.nut -acodec copy -vcodec copy -y > second.nut > + ./ffmpeg -flags +bitexact -i $i -acodec copy -vcodec copy -y first.nut > + ./ffmpeg -flags +bitexact -i first.nut -acodec copy -vcodec copy -y > second.nut
OK. Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
