On 04/25/2011 12:21 PM, Aℓex Converse wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Justin Ruggles
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 04/23/2011 03:55 PM, Justin Ruggles wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Based on patches by clsid2 in ffdshow-tryout.
>>>> ---
>>>>  configure               |    2 ++
>>>>  libavcodec/aac.h        |    2 +-
>>>>  libavcodec/aacdec.c     |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>>  libavcodec/aacsbr.c     |    7 +++++--
>>>>  libavcodec/ac3dec.c     |   33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>  libavcodec/dca.c        |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>  libavcodec/vorbis_dec.c |   23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>  7 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>
>>>
>>> This updated patch fixes decoding AAC w/ SBR.  But one of the fate aac
>>> samples doesn't pass due to being slightly off.  I don't know the best
>>> way to fix that...
>>>
>>> TEST    aac-am00_88
>>> stddev:    1.91 PSNR: 90.69 MAXDIFF:   64 bytes: 11563008/ 11563008
>>
>> For float, just increase the amount by which it is allowed to be off
>> in the test specs.
>>
> 
> 64 seems fairly large. Are you sure scale isn't off somewhere in the
> main predictor?


Yeah, I thought 64 was kind of large too.  I'll do some more analysis on
that sample.

-Justin
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to