Gil Pedersen <[email protected]> writes:

> Attached patch will allow ff_network_wait_fd() to return when the fd
> encounters an error or disconnection (HUP). Once returned, the next
> read/write call on the fd will result in an error and possibly a
> signal, which should provide better feedback than the current method
> of waiting indefinitely.
>

I'm not a C guru but should not that be more explicit?
Two ? in one return seems enough to kill readability...
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to