On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:49:33AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:24:56PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> > >> I prefer to always s-o-b patches. > >> > >> Think of this scenario; a person sends a patch, it is modified by > >> somebody else, and then applied. Did the original author agree to > >> those changes? If the s-o-b is there, yes, otherwise not. If you don't > >> s-o-b all the patches, you wouldn't know. > > > > I don't see how you can determine this from the s-o-b line. It is > > not a cryptographic signature, it's easily possible to modify the > > patch and keep the s-o-b line. > > Yes, but that's not good manners, specially from a maintainer.
I think it is pretty normal to make minor changes like fixing code style or log messages. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
