On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 07:54:13AM -0700, Alex Converse wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 07:46:04AM -0700, Alex Converse wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > --- > >> > 30 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 360 deletions(-) > >> > >> Why? > > > > Because they are cruft - easy to restore in the unlikely case they are > > needed, pointless clutter in the meantime. > > > >> do these not compile if turned on? > > > > I could not be bothered to test, but I'm quite sure that many of them > > will fail to compile. In the past, when I reenabled some commented-out > > code block it would often fail to even compile ... > > > >> Can we turn some of them into av_dlog()s instead? > > > > Not worth the effort IMO. > > Turning on disabled debug code has helped me solve numerous issues.
Would you not have been able to write that debug code on-the-fly in a few instants? Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
