On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 09:45:51AM -0700, Aℓex Converse wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 03:34:03PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:41:27AM -0700, Aℓex Converse wrote:
> >> > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > Please trim your quotes, thank you.
> >> >
> >> > Maybe if you sent a patch on top of the patch you hijacked there would
> >> > be less to trim.
> >>
> >> For your perusal I attached the output of
> >>
> >>   git diff -w s302m_alex:libavcodec/s302m.c s302m:libavcodec/s302m.c
> >
> > Scratch that broken one, here comes the real deal.
> >
> 
> >      const uint8_t *buf = avpkt->data;
> > -    int frame_size, buf_size = avpkt->size;
> > +    int buf_size       = avpkt->size, frame_size;
> >
> >     frame_size = s302m_parse_frame_header(avctx, buf, buf_size);
> 
> I really don't think this is any more readable. In fact I think it's
> arguably less readable.

Changed to

   const uint8_t *buf = avpkt->data;
   int buf_size       = avpkt->size;

   int frame_size = s302m_parse_frame_header(avctx, buf, buf_size);

and pushed.

Thanks for your patience, Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to