On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 09:29:20PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > On Sat, 21 May 2011 14:18:08 +0200, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 01:57:00PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 21 May 2011 13:38:44 +0200, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:25:23PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > > > The encoder has never produced files that could be decoded > > > > > with any software and there should be no reason to create > > > > > such files anyway. > > > > > > > > I wonder how hard it would be to fix this thing instead? > > > > > > > > > > I wonder why would you want to support _encoding_ to obscure and evil > > > formats. > > > > I don't think we do any moralizing about the formats we encode to > > and we encode to more obscure and more evil formats than this one. > > That said, I have no particular attachment to the encoder, I'm > > just wondering if fixing it instead is worth the effort. > > If you feel like it, please go ahead. > If somebody else wants to do that in the future, he can get > the removed stuff from history. > I very much doubts anyone cares though.
I tend to agree, so IMO push your patch anytime. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
