Hi,

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Anton Khirnov <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Frank Barchard <[email protected]>
>
> Heres a benchmark
>
> VOFW 5120  VOFW 21504    Note
> 10438.8 10344.2       timex ffmpeg -y -i tulip2.mp4 tulip2.yuv
> 25611.9    24256.9       timex ffmpeg -y -itulip2.mp4 -s 1272x724 tulip2.yuv
> 24485.7    26006.6
> 28573.1    24291.3
> 24069.1    26995.9
> 25684.95   25387.675     average
>
> This is on a Nehalem i7.  Despite being a 500 frame, 720p video, the numbers
> fluctuate, so I took an average of 4 runs.
>
> Another reason I'd like this change is youtube accepts videos with higher
> resolutions than 5120.
> 16384 is vp8's maximum resolution, so that should keep us amused for a
> little longer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Khirnov <[email protected]>
> ---
>  libswscale/swscale_internal.h |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libswscale/swscale_internal.h b/libswscale/swscale_internal.h
> index 2369546..12541ea 100644
> --- a/libswscale/swscale_internal.h
> +++ b/libswscale/swscale_internal.h
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
>  #define MAX_FILTER_SIZE 256
>
>  #if ARCH_X86
> -#define VOFW 5120
> +#define VOFW 21504
>  #else
>  #define VOFW 2048 // faster on PPC and not tested on others
>  #endif

No, this patch is not fine. I intend to really fix this.

Ronald
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to