On date Saturday 2011-05-28 07:14:39 +0200, Anton Khirnov encoded:
>
> On Fri, 27 May 2011 21:03:49 -0400, Justin Ruggles <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On 05/27/2011 08:39 PM, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> >
> > > Also deprecate avcodec_get_pix_fmt_name() in its favor.
> > > ---
> > > doc/APIchanges | 4 ++++
> > > libavcodec/avcodec.h | 8 ++++++++
> > > libavcodec/imgconvert.c | 7 +++----
> > > libavcodec/version.h | 3 +++
> > > libavutil/pixdesc.c | 6 ++++++
> > > libavutil/pixdesc.h | 9 +++++++++
> > > 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > Yes, that does seem like a better place for that function.
> >
> > I think lavu and lavc need a minor bump for this move.
>
> Lavu yes, lavc no (nothing changes in lavc technically, there's no
> point in testing for 'version in which function foo was deprecated').
I was used to increase micro for that scenario, so you can say
e.g. libfoo 1.2.3 requires libbar >= 3.2.0, and you have this
dependency documented in the pkg-config files.
I leave bumping to the committer for avoiding conflicts when applying
the patch in case other bumps are done in the meaningwhile.
--
Blessed are the forgetful: for they get the better even of their blunders.
-- Nietzsche
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
