Hi, On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Justin Ruggles <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/14/2011 12:40 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Justin Ruggles >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> gcc stopped complaining with av_unused() but valgrind still thinks that the >>> variable is used uninitialized and emits errors. >>> --- >>> libavcodec/ac3enc_template.c | 2 +- >>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> Looking at the code, isn't valgrind wrong here? I'm seriously not >> seeing how that can happen... > > Yes, I've been over and over this function and the only conclusion I can > come to is that valgrind is just wrong here.
So mask it out? No need to apply the patch, I think... (Not that I care all that much, it's just that was policy in the past.) Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
