On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:31:30AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:51:42PM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> libavformat/4xm.c | 1 + > >> libavformat/aiffenc.c | 1 + > >> libavformat/cafdec.c | 1 + > >> libavformat/ffmdec.c | 1 + > >> libavformat/ffmenc.c | 1 + > >> libavformat/flvdec.c | 1 + > >> libavformat/flvenc.c | 2 ++ > >> libavformat/gxfenc.c | 1 + > >> libavformat/matroskaenc.c | 1 + > >> libavformat/mov.c | 1 + > >> libavformat/movenc.c | 1 + > >> libavformat/nuv.c | 1 + > >> libavformat/rtmppkt.c | 1 + > >> libavformat/rtmpproto.c | 1 + > >> libavformat/soxdec.c | 1 + > >> libavformat/soxenc.c | 1 + > >> libavformat/thp.c | 1 + > >> libavutil/avutil.h | 1 - > >> 18 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > The whole 5-patch set is OK if you tested that all targets like > > examples etc. still build, which you told me is the case. > > So go ahead and push when you feel like it. > > Do we want this in before the release?
Good question. Since this could be called a change in behavior, it should not be in a point release. So it's either 0.7 or never on the 0.7 branch IMO. I would not mind putting it in, but I'm undecided - Reinhard? Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
