Stefano Sabatini <[email protected]> writes: > On date Wednesday 2011-06-29 14:46:34 -0700, Ronald S. Bultje encoded: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:13:16PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > [...] >> >> --- a/ffmpeg.c >> >> +++ b/ffmpeg.c >> >> @@ -1206,6 +1213,11 @@ static void do_video_out(AVFormatContext *s, >> >> } >> >> sws_scale(ost->img_resample_ctx, formatted_picture->data, >> >> formatted_picture->linesize, >> >> 0, ost->resample_height, final_picture->data, >> >> final_picture->linesize); >> >> +#else >> >> + av_log(NULL, AV_LOG_ERROR, >> >> + "Image resampling needed, please compile with swscale\n"); >> >> + exit(1); >> >> +#endif >> > >> > Hmmm, well, that's why we require swscale for ffmpeg - what is the >> > grand plan here? Does ffmpeg actually get used without swscale? >> >> As said, it's not ultra-functional but still does some things. > > +1, think of embedded systems with very limited memory resources and > very specific uses, 100KB of memory footprint less can save you the > day.
Nobody runs the ffmpeg executable on such systems. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
