John Stebbins wrote:
On 08/25/2011 07:45 PM, John Stebbins wrote:
As we discussed on IRC this morning, this makes the value of repeat_pict
returned
by the parsers the same as the value returned by the decoders.
The parser was returning a value for repeat_pict that was the
actual number of repeats + 1.
Passes fate with the exception of 1 pre-existing failure
(fate-h264-conformance-mr3_tandberg_b).
Heh, fate passed, but some samples I have that use pulldown didn't play
smoothly with avplay. One line fix in compute_frame_duration.
@@ -1589,7 +1589,7 @@ static int output_packet(InputStream *ist, int ist_index,
}
ist->next_pts = ist->pts =
guess_correct_pts(&ist->pts_ctx, picture.pkt_pts, picture.pkt_dts);
if (ist->st->codec->time_base.num != 0) {
- int ticks= ist->st->parser ? ist->st->parser->repeat_pict+1 :
ist->st->codec->ticks_per_frame;
+ int ticks= ist->st->parser ?
ist->st->parser->repeat_pict+ist->st->codec->ticks_per_frame :
+ ist->st->codec->ticks_per_frame;
int ticks = st->st->codec->ticks_per_frame + (ist->st->parser ?
ist->st->parser->repeat_pict : 0);
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
