Hi Sean,

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Sean McGovern <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Sean McGovern <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Should I go ahead and modify this to mark it with MMX and SSE only? Is
>>> that a reasonable baseline requirement?
>>
>> I believe we require MMX only ATM, unless --disable-mmx is specified
>> as a configure argument. We don't require SSE unless the CPU supports
>> it.
>
> So should I go ahead and only require MMX? If so I'll cook up a patch
> and send later.

Yes, I think that would be correct. Even better would be to require
MMX if the macro HAVE_MMX is set in config.h, and else don't require
MMX.

Ronald
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to