2011/9/15 Måns Rullgård <[email protected]>: > Alex Converse <[email protected]> writes: > >> --- >> tests/fate.mak | 2 +- >> tests/ref/fate/ea-tqi-adpcm | 1 - >> 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tests/fate.mak b/tests/fate.mak >> index a349e5c..a049783 100644 >> --- a/tests/fate.mak >> +++ b/tests/fate.mak >> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ fate-ea-tgv-ima-ea-eacs: CMD = framecrc -i >> $(SAMPLES)/ea-tgv/INTRO8K-partial.TG >> FATE_TESTS += fate-ea-tgv-ima-ea-sead >> fate-ea-tgv-ima-ea-sead: CMD = framecrc -i $(SAMPLES)/ea-tgv/INTEL_S.TGV >> -pix_fmt rgb24 >> FATE_TESTS += fate-ea-tqi-adpcm >> -fate-ea-tqi-adpcm: CMD = framecrc -i >> $(SAMPLES)/ea-wve/networkBackbone-partial.wve >> +fate-ea-tqi-adpcm: CMD = framecrc -i >> $(SAMPLES)/ea-wve/networkBackbone-partial.wve -vframes 26 >> FATE_TESTS += fate-ea-vp60 >> fate-ea-vp60: CMD = framecrc -i $(SAMPLES)/ea-vp6/g36.vp6 >> FATE_TESTS += fate-ea-vp61 >> diff --git a/tests/ref/fate/ea-tqi-adpcm b/tests/ref/fate/ea-tqi-adpcm >> index c79eed5..4fbc117 100644 >> --- a/tests/ref/fate/ea-tqi-adpcm >> +++ b/tests/ref/fate/ea-tqi-adpcm >> @@ -49,4 +49,3 @@ >> 0, 144000, 115200, 0x65fd5e60 >> 1, 144000, 5936, 0x2174304d >> 0, 150000, 115200, 0x0c256424 >> -0, 156000, 115200, 0xa9cdd8d2 >> -- > > What bug is this really hiding? >
We fall back to a previous frame data if a frame is truncated which is an implementation detail due to the use of av_fast_malloc(). This looks kind of funny http://imgur.com/a/PySOc#GXrJ2 , isn't correct and therefore shouldn't be something we test for. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
