On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 09:43:27 -0700, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/18/11 7:02 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > From: Stefano Sabatini<[email protected]> > > > > The comment is meant to be about the align parameter. > > > > Signed-off-by: Anton Khirnov<[email protected]> > > --- > > libavfilter/defaults.c | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/libavfilter/defaults.c b/libavfilter/defaults.c > > index 5532953..89e401c 100644 > > --- a/libavfilter/defaults.c > > +++ b/libavfilter/defaults.c > > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ AVFilterBufferRef > > *avfilter_default_get_video_buffer(AVFilterLink *link, int per > > uint8_t *data[4]; > > AVFilterBufferRef *picref = NULL; > > > > - // +2 is needed for swscaler, +16 to be SIMD-friendly > > + // align: +2 is needed for swscaler, +16 to be SIMD-friendly > > if ((ret = av_image_alloc(data, linesize, w, h, link->format, 16))< > > 0) > > return NULL; > > > > I can't see the +2 and the +16 this comment is referring to... >
16 is the last argument of av_image_alloc(), +2 really isn't there, i guess could be removed. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
