Maxim <[email protected]> writes: > Hi crews, > > Yes, it's no mistake! What you see is just another code implementing > ProRes decoder. > > Now I'm going to explain that confusion. > Writing a ProRes compatible decoder began as team project in 2010. > During this period, I created an internal documentation on the coding > algorithm (entropy coding, slicing and inverse transform); a part of > this doc has been published at > > http://wiki.multimedia.cx/index.php?title=Apple_ProRes&action=history > > already in 2010 (see my nickname "Maxpol" for a proof), but not to much > to avoid an implementation by someone else. > > Later I wrote a working decoder. Due to the lack for interlaced frames > it was incomplete, but it could handle the most of samples available. > > Further I shared my docs and code with another developer, whose name I > don't want to mention here. He wrote his own code, heavily based on my work. > > The team suffered from poor communication and political intrigues... > > A few days ago that other developer has submitted his decoder > anonymously. I feel that the code, containing a significant part of my > work, was released without proper credit.
This makes him guilty of copyright violation. I would have a lawyer send him a nice letter. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
