Janne Grunau <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:55:41AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> Kostya Shishkov <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:35:50AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> >> "Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]> writes: >> >> >> >> > --- >> >> > libavcodec/arm/h264dsp_init_arm.c | 2 + >> >> > libavcodec/h264.c | 126 +++++++++------------ >> >> > libavcodec/h264dsp.c | 28 ++---- >> >> > libavcodec/h264dsp.h | 10 +- >> >> > libavcodec/h264dsp_template.c | 28 ++--- >> >> > libavcodec/ppc/h264_altivec.c | 44 +++---- >> >> > libavcodec/x86/h264_weight.asm | 210 >> >> > +++++++++++++--------------------- >> >> > libavcodec/x86/h264_weight_10bit.asm | 145 ++++++++--------------- >> >> > libavcodec/x86/h264dsp_mmx.c | 175 >> >> > ++++++++++------------------ >> >> > 9 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 475 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> Patch does not apply. >> > >> > As discussed on IRC it depends on undisclosed amount of other patches >> > touching H.264. >> >> I think patches sent to the list should apply cleanly. Review is >> impossible otherwise. > > I agree. If they depend on previous patches still waiting for review, > the entire series should be send.
This particular patch shouldn't depend on any others. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
