On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:48:53 +0100, Reinhard Tartler <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> On So, Nov 06, 2011 at 19:14:30 (CET), Anton Khirnov wrote:
> 
> > ---
> >  libavformat/utils.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libavformat/utils.c b/libavformat/utils.c
> > index 7813976..8d0ae05 100644
> > --- a/libavformat/utils.c
> > +++ b/libavformat/utils.c
> > @@ -1384,7 +1384,7 @@ void ff_read_frame_flush(AVFormatContext *s)
> >  #if FF_API_SEEK_PUBLIC
> >  void av_update_cur_dts(AVFormatContext *s, AVStream *ref_st, int64_t 
> > timestamp)
> >  {
> > -    return ff_update_cur_dts(s, ref_st, timestamp);
> > +    ff_update_cur_dts(s, ref_st, timestamp);
> >  }
> >  #endif
> 
> seems okay, but why not changing the signature to return something
> instead?
> 

??
Why would we do that?
This is a deprecated wrapper around a function that doesn't
return anything.

-- 
Anton Khirnov
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to