On Nov 9, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 08:42:24AM +0100, Sebastien Zwickert wrote: >> On Nov 9, 2011, at 1:52 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 10:40:42PM +0100, Sebastien Zwickert wrote: >>>> >>>> In vda.h, I undefined Picture after the inclusion of VDADecoder.h (Picture >>>> struct is redefined in QD.h >>>> which get included from VDADecoder.h). >>>> Unfortunately, I have no better workaround for the emmintrin.h and >>>> gcc-4.2.1 issue. (emmintrin.h get >>>> included from VDADecoder.h). >>> I have no better idea myself although I must say it's quite ugly :-( >> >> Is that a locking point ? > > I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "locking point" - it's not a > reason to reject the patch outright if that's what you had in mind.
It is what I had in mind :) Thank you to make clear this point. Best regards, Sebastien. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
