On 11/10/11 1:02 PM, Janne Grunau wrote:
+ pkt_dts += ((int64_t)AV_TIME_BASE *
+ ist->st->codec->time_base.num * ticks) /
+ ist->st->codec->time_base.den;
Shouldn't we have a function that does something similar already?
> + int ticks = ist->st->parser ?
> ist->st->parser->repeat_pict+1 : ist->st->codec->ticks_per_frame;
Sort of unrelated to the patch but, repeat_pict seems the wrong term for
what it should deliver or the whole thing is misleading...
lu
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
