Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> writes:

> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>
>>>> From ba07b4888a5195ccb1161ae4edd5d64a5c4ffd00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>> From: John Stebbins <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:39:18 -0800
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] Fix httpproxy protocol dependencies
>>>>
>>>> Building with --disable-network failed with undefined reference.
>>>> ---
>>>>  configure |    1 +
>>>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/configure b/configure
>>>> index 6e4259f..352150b 100755
>>>> --- a/configure
>>>> +++ b/configure
>>>> @@ -1484,6 +1484,7 @@ http_protocol_deps="network"
>>>>  http_protocol_select="tcp_protocol"
>>>>  https_protocol_select="tls_protocol"
>>>>  mmsh_protocol_select="http_protocol"
>>>> +httpproxy_protocol_select="http_protocol"
>>>>  mmst_protocol_deps="network"
>>>>  rtmp_protocol_select="tcp_protocol"
>>>>  rtp_protocol_select="udp_protocol"
>>>> --
>>>
>>> OK
>>
>> This shouldn't be needed actually, if I would have added the object
>> files properly in the Makefile. John, does the patch I just posted
>> fix your issue, too?
>
> As to clarify why they shouldn't need to depend on each other in
> configure - they're two different protocol implementations that just
> share a bit of code, so you can very well use the httpproxy protocol
> without having the http protocol built in at all, with that patch.

In that case the second patch is the right way.

BTW, what is the purpose of the httpproxy protocol?

-- 
Måns Rullgård
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to