On 24/11/11 00:49, Justin Ruggles wrote:
ist->next_pts += ((int64_t)AV_TIME_BASE * decoded_frame->nb_samples) / + avctx->sample_rate;
ist->next_pts += ((int64_t)AV_TIME_BASE * decoded_frame->nb_samples) / + avctx->sample_rate; Is duration less reliable? lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
