On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:26:37AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > From: Reimar Döffinger <[email protected]> > > Treating them like 0 is safest, current code would invoke > undefined pointer arithmetic behaviour in this case. > > Signed-off-by: Anton Khirnov <[email protected]> > --- > libavutil/lzo.c | 6 +++--- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libavutil/lzo.c b/libavutil/lzo.c > index 743d596..85b1f94 100644 > --- a/libavutil/lzo.c > +++ b/libavutil/lzo.c > @@ -175,11 +175,11 @@ int av_lzo1x_decode(void *out, int *outlen, const void > *in, int *inlen) { > int state= 0; > int x; > LZOContext c; > - if (!*outlen || !*inlen) { > + if (*outlen <= 0 || *inlen <= 0) { > int res = 0; > - if (!*outlen) > + if (*outlen <= 0) > res |= AV_LZO_OUTPUT_FULL; > - if (!*inlen) > + if (*inlen <= 0) > res |= AV_LZO_INPUT_DEPLETED; > return res; > } > --
looks sane _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
