On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:04:10AM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 26/11/11 06:31, Mashiat Sarker Shakkhar wrote: > >From: Michael Niedermayer<[email protected]> > > > >Fixes: vc1 file from Ticket606 > >Fixes: vc1+vc1+++artifacts*.vc1 > >Fixes: mpeg+vc1+++salxxos.evo > > fcm; ///< 0->Progressive, 2->Frame-Interlace, 3->Field-Interlace > > So Use the same scantable for Progressive and Field-Interlace ?
For us FCM is 0, 1 and 2. And scantables for interlaced mode should be used (it seems from the standard unless I got it wrong) for both FCM = 1 or 2. Though the old approach was wrong too - there are enough files with interlaced mode = 1 and FCM=0 (HD-DVD featured that, for example). _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
