On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 07:15:24PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 06:54:29PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: > > Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >--- > > > tests/Makefile | 1 + > > > tests/fate.mak | 50 ----------------------------------- > > > tests/fate/pcm.mak | 74 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) > > > create mode 100644 tests/fate/pcm.mak > > > > > >--- /dev/null > > >+++ b/tests/fate/pcm.mak > > >@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ > > >+FATE_TESTS += fate-adpcm-ea-r2 > > > > ADPCM is not PCM. > > Well, a special kind of PCM, so why not group it all together under > the PCM label? I can split it further if you prefer...
Because every audio codec is a special kind of PCM, sometimes more special, sometimes less. Though grouping DPCM and ADPCM codecs is rather natural IMO. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
