In lcov the coverage was 0%thats why i made those tests. But the tests are in screen.mak. On Dec 28, 2011, at 4:25 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Derek Buitenhuis > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> --- >>> tests/Makefile | 4 ++++ >>> tests/fate/zmbv_15bit.mak | 2 ++ >>> tests/fate/zmbv_16bit.mak | 2 ++ >>> tests/fate/zmbv_32bit.mak | 2 ++ >>> tests/fate/zmbv_8bit.mak | 2 ++ >>> tests/ref/fate/zmbv_15bit | 3 +++ >>> tests/ref/fate/zmbv_16bit | 13 +++++++++++++ >>> tests/ref/fate/zmbv_32bit | 2 ++ >>> tests/ref/fate/zmbv_8bit | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >>> 9 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 tests/fate/zmbv_15bit.mak >>> create mode 100644 tests/fate/zmbv_16bit.mak >>> create mode 100644 tests/fate/zmbv_32bit.mak >>> create mode 100644 tests/fate/zmbv_8bit.mak >>> create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/zmbv_15bit >>> create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/zmbv_16bit >>> create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/zmbv_32bit >>> create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/zmbv_8bit >> >> >> You shouldn't create a separate .mak for each test. ZMBV >> is a lossless screen capture codec if I recall, so these >> tests should live inside screen.mak... >> >> Actually, on close inspection, ZMBV already had fate tests, >> all the way back to: >> >> fad0977886f99e11ec1e27f79bcb9c56737bdb0 Add FATE tests >> >> So uh... I really, really hate to say it... but perhaps >> your work was wasted... :( > > They don't show up in lcov then? Or what happened, Oana? > > Ronald > _______________________________________________ > libav-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
