On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:51:18PM -0500, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > On 28/12/2011 11:51 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >Looks like it belongs in a more central place to avoid scattering such > >checks across all demuxers. Hasn't this come up before > > Good question. > > I do sort of wonder... why is sample_rate signed at all? How does a > negative sample rate even make sense?
Typing "int" is faster than typing "unsigned", what else do you need for a reason? _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
