On 2011-12-31 03:52:29 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 30/12/11 20:03, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > >On 30/12/2011 2:02 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >>It would remove the repeated fmt.fmt.pix, which is what I assumed Derek > >>was finding unsightly. > > > >Yup. > > Looks nicer? > > struct v4l2_format fmt; > + struct v4l2_pix_format *pix = &fmt.fmt.pix; > + > int res; > > memset(&fmt, 0, sizeof(struct v4l2_format)); > + > fmt.type = V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE; > - fmt.fmt.pix.width = *width; > - fmt.fmt.pix.height = *height; > - fmt.fmt.pix.pixelformat = pix_fmt; > - fmt.fmt.pix.field = V4L2_FIELD_ANY; > + pix->width = *width; > + pix->height = *height; > + pix->pixelformat = pix_fmt; > + pix->field = V4L2_FIELD_ANY; > +
yes, looks nicer and there are even more occurances of fmt.fmt.pix.... Janne _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
