Hi, On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Janne Grunau <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2011-12-31 09:32:21 -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Janne Grunau <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Since the conditions for the actual usage are more specific a less >> > preferred method can be used. This would cause compilation errors >> > because necessary headers are not included. >> > --- >> > libavcodec/pthread.c | 6 ++++-- >> > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> Can't we duplicate the exact conditions used in the actual code? This >> seems similar to the register-mess with the h264 inline asm (function >> declaration vs call). > > unfortunately not, the additional checks depend on things which are > declared in the headers. Adding checks to configure seems to be overkill.
Hm, good enough then, go for it. Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
