On So, Jan 08, 2012 at 16:41:22 (CET), Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Reinhard Tartler <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Ronald S. Bultje <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Reinhard Tartler <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On 05/01/12 21:50, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> + unsigned >>>>>> ch_left, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> if it is vc->audio_channels is passing it around this way that much >>>>> efficient? >>>> >>>> Well, I don't see how this could be solved in a more performant way. >>>> >>>> Besides, can anyone with access to >>>> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=101458 check if >>>> there are testcases related to this issue attached there? I'd like to >>>> verify this patch. >>> >>> Bug is now public. >> >> Excellent. I was able to reproduce this issue with master and 0.7, but >> not with 0.6 and 0.5 because these branches do not support webm yet. I >> wonder what to do now: backport anyway or claim the bug was not >> present in these releases? > > The change to support webm was relatively small, you can backport that > and show that it exists - I'm pretty sure the bug exists in these > branches also.
Yeah, that'd be possible. I'll don't intend to start working on that right now, it seems not out of the world to me. > Then again, do people really actually use these branches to play > vorbis data, as opposed to acting as data-center servers or so? Well, debian does ship the 0.5 branch in their current stable release, so does Ubuntu. So I'd say there is a pretty considerable amount of machines out there running this code. Cheers, Reinhard -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
