On 01/10/2012 06:03 PM, Aneesh Dogra wrote:

> ---
>  tests/fate/dpcm.mak      |    3 +++
>  tests/ref/fate/adpcm-4xm |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/adpcm-4xm
> 
> diff --git a/tests/fate/dpcm.mak b/tests/fate/dpcm.mak
> index 606a524..4cd90e1 100644
> --- a/tests/fate/dpcm.mak
> +++ b/tests/fate/dpcm.mak
> @@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
> +FATE_TESTS += fate-adpcm-4xm
> +fate-adpcm-4xm: CMD = md5 -i $(SAMPLES)/4xm/dracula.4xm -vn -f s16le
> +
>  FATE_TESTS += fate-adpcm-ea-r2
>  fate-adpcm-ea-r2: CMD = crc -i $(SAMPLES)/ea-mpc/THX_logo.mpc -vn
>  
> diff --git a/tests/ref/fate/adpcm-4xm b/tests/ref/fate/adpcm-4xm
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9371c04
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/ref/fate/adpcm-4xm
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +ab8ab2190da58fc5a6c88987f941a738


moved sample to fate-suite.

after thinking about this more, I think I would prefer a framecrc test
here instead of md5 since it also would test the timestamps and packet
sizes being returned from the demuxer.

-Justin
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to