Hi, On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Janne Grunau <[email protected]> wrote: > I was convinced that the s->mb_y - 1 in the second hunk is save. > There is actually one mb row more finished than reported progress on > since the loopfilter needs to run. AVFrame.mb_type and .motion_val > should have been safe to access though.
So we don't yet know why it fails? That's weird... Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
