On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Kostya Shishkov <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4 January 2012 07:27, John Brooks <[email protected]> wrote: >> For small video dimensions, these calculations of the upper bound >> for pixel access may have a negative result. Using an unsigned >> comparison to bound a potentially negative value only works if >> the greater operand is non-negative. Fixed by doing edge emulation >> when the upper bound is probably negative, everywhere that this >> pattern appears. >> --- >> libavcodec/mpegvideo.c | 9 ++++++--- >> libavcodec/mpegvideo_common.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------- >> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > LGTM
Bump for this and the snow patch; can we get these pushed, unless someone else has comments? - John _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
