On 01/18/2012 12:43 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:11:36 -0500, Justin Ruggles <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Mostly looks good. The function already frees the packet in most cases. >> >> Not sure about the current vs. new wording for @return. What is that "1 >> if end of stream wanted", and is it true? > > If I read that function correctly, it never returns 1. I'd appreciate it > if you (or anyone else) looked at it and confirmed.
Confirmed. Patch looks ok then. Thanks, Justin _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
