Hi, On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Martin Storsjö wrote: > >> For ismv/isma, the time scale might not be the same as the sample >> rate. >> --- >> libavformat/movenc.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/libavformat/movenc.c b/libavformat/movenc.c >> index 2113b3f..4ff4b7e 100644 >> --- a/libavformat/movenc.c >> +++ b/libavformat/movenc.c >> @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ static int mov_write_audio_tag(AVIOContext *pb, >> MOVTrack *track) >> avio_wb16(pb, 0); >> avio_wb32(pb, 0x00010000); >> avio_wb32(pb, 72); >> - avio_wb64(pb, av_double2int(track->timescale)); >> + avio_wb64(pb, av_double2int(track->enc->sample_rate)); >> avio_wb32(pb, track->enc->channels); >> avio_wb32(pb, 0x7F000000); >> avio_wb32(pb, av_get_bits_per_sample(track->enc->codec_id)); >> @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static int mov_write_audio_tag(AVIOContext *pb, >> MOVTrack *track) >> avio_wb16(pb, 0); >> >> avio_wb16(pb, 0); /* packet size (= 0) */ >> - avio_wb16(pb, track->timescale); /* Time scale */ >> + avio_wb16(pb, track->enc->sample_rate); >> avio_wb16(pb, 0); /* Reserved */ >> } >> >> -- >> 1.7.3.1 > > > This lacks review, should be straightforward.
I actually checked this one, LGTM. Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
