Hi, 2012/2/1 Ronald S. Bultje <[email protected]>: > some of the failures we see after bswap32 was SSE'ified.
I guess I'm responsible for those failures (assuming destination was always aligned, while it is not guaranteed). This is off-topic, but if this goes through, then I suggest the following: 1) Mention somewhere the allowed assumptions for bswap_buf; 2) Rewrite (and in fact simplify) a bit the SSE implementation, as I guess the padding will now allow working on batches of 4 values at a minimum. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
